November Surf-Cambria
Loving
We were emotionally spent as we walked from the theatre when we encountered a friend and her husband who there with other couples. They are mixed race couples who gather annually to celebrate Mildred and Richard Loving, the Virginia couple who's love changed the US Constitution.
Married in 1958 they were arrested in Virginia where state law forbade black and white to marry, live together, bear children or to love each other. Forced to move to Washington DC, where they had been married, they began a family and longed to return to their beautiful rural home.
Director/Writer Jeff Nichols has crafted a quiet and understated powerhouse film that tells history but also speaks to the current American dilemma.
Joel Edgerton delivers an Oscar worthy performance as a white stone mason Richard Loving who simply wants to be left alone to love and live with his wife. Edgerton's quiet strength and reserve emotes with a power that smolders from the screen. Ethiopian Ruth Negga is vulnerable, gentle and long suffering as Mildred.
Joel Edgerton delivers an Oscar worthy performance as a white stone mason Richard Loving who simply wants to be left alone to love and live with his wife. Edgerton's quiet strength and reserve emotes with a power that smolders from the screen. Ethiopian Ruth Negga is vulnerable, gentle and long suffering as Mildred.
Nichols, born in Little Rock and educated at the University of North Carolina has an instinctive feel and sense of the southern culture and history that created the Loving case. Nichols became interested in the story of the Supreme Court case and the role of the ACLU in bringing justice to the Lovings when he viewed a documentary by Nancy Buirski, who is one of the producers.
There is an authenticity played marvelously by the cast. Loving won the 2016 Palm d'Or at Cannes. This 2 hour study of American history and love has a message that should be heard. Be prepared to ride a roller coaster of emotion.
Photo by Oswaldo Salas-print from Tom's collection
Frequent readers may recall previous posts from the Cuba File. I'm gathering reaction and preparing a new post for later this week.
the vote truth and consequence
It looks like you have to go back to 1876 to find a presidential outcome that rivals our recent travail.
Back then Democrat Samuel Tilden shellacked Ohio Republican Rutherford B. Hayes in the popular vote, but he lost in the electoral college, only after some still controversial maneuvers.
Of course we know at least 2 million more American voters wanted Hillary Clinton to lead us than wanted Donald Trump. Once again the archaic and out balance representation of the Electoral College deprives the majority of Americans their choice and once again hands a gift to the Republican candidate who received an underwhelming minority of votes.
Does it matter? Indeed and here's how it is likely to. President Trump leads from a position of weakness. He does not have a mandate as most voting Americans didn't want him. While the Republicans control the Senate and House, they will be dependent upon Democrats to get a majority of votes to pass legislation. Democrats have vowed to protect programs enacted under President Obama. I'm hopeful the Democrats will take a realistic and collegial position, willing to engage in give and take. That would be a drastic reversal from the Republican leadership which vowed on day 1 of the Obama administration to guarantee the first African American President fail and not be reelected.
Donald Trump's election is also a repudiation of that Republican scorched earth policy. People who were fed up with government or who felt neglected also blame the congressional grid lock engineered by the Republicans. While a minority party it is our hope the Democrats behave as Americans first and partisans second. That's a far cry from the past 8 years.
We live in historic times eh?
do you see a face in the surf?
look a little left of center of the frame. see anything that resembles a face or head of lion or ???
See you down the trail.
You might want to cut back on whatever you are consuming.
ReplyDeleteA) That line has been applied already in the last 7 days. Someone posing as you may know that.
DeleteB) Our exceedingly lucid and bright friend, with a great historical reach and resume has found one of your favorites, lurking beneath the foam.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt looks like the face of Kurt Vonnegut.
ReplyDeleteCompare it to this photo:
http://www.notablebiographies.com/images/uewb_10_img0706.jpg
Sharon,
DeleteThat is stunning. You are spot on. As our old mutual friend Frank says,
"Another Vonnegut moment!" And so it goes.
Yes, I see a head of a lion. Or dog. Or....
ReplyDeleteOr...as Sharon said, Kurt. There is definitely a shape there.
DeleteAbout Castro - Can't wait to hear it!
ReplyDeleteAbout "most Americans didn't want Trump" - To be concise, about two million more people who voted chose Hilary over Trump. You should be the first to recognize that America is a republic and not a democracy. Many of those arrested for "demonstrating" after the election had not even voted.
While I would not advocate that two million people voted illegally, it is impossible to determine or prove either way since the courts have ruled that the states have to accept the word of the potential voter about whether they are a citizen and legally entitled to vote.
About that alleged vote fraud-check this link
Deletehttp://www.niemanlab.org/2016/11/propublicas-collaborative-reporting-experiment-takes-on-voter-fraud-and-finds-no-evidence-of-it/?utm_source=Daily+Lab+email+list&utm_campaign=102538bd68-dailylabemail3&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d68264fd5e-102538bd68-396075501
None of which addresses the issue of non-citizen voter registrations. There is no way to know how many of the purported ten million illegal aliens voted. Entirely different issue than the reports of no incidents of polling place disruptions, etc.
ReplyDeleteIs it really an issue? What's the proof? Where's the data? Is it just spin or speculation? Is it another example of "fake news?" who is pushing this idea? What's the source? Certainly we can't take Trump's down personal rants or tweets as gospel on this, not with his record of open and provable lies and overstatement, nor with his narcissistic history?
DeleteTom
ReplyDeleteWhy bother answering the Anon posts....anyone who posts that way is hiding behind the curtain supplied by the venue, and does not have the courage to identify themselves with their comments.
I don't care if they are left, right or from mars, if they won't even say who they are, they are beneath notice.
Mike
I hear you. I do wish they'd sign a name or use their blogger ID.
Delete