Light/Breezes

Light/Breezes
SUNRISE AT DEATH VALLEY-Photo by Tom Cochrun

Saturday, September 11, 2021

SURVIVING AGAIN


        Our destiny changed that day and we've see an endless media loop exhausting how many ways that is so.
     None of us who saw it can erase the image. But today 1 in 4 in America were not alive then. History and education should be  the guardian of the memory. 
    
    A piece of the once "angry young man" has stirred in this old boomer, but not perhaps as you might think. To quote Ed Murrow again, "This just might do nobody any good." I'll pick up his next line too,  "...some just might accuse this reporter of fouling his own comfortable nest..."

     A Marine, counsel for the Commandant, a strong man of enduring courage wept and was overwhelmed as he remembered the day the plane struck near his office in the Pentagon.
     A brother recalls seeing his twin return to a tower to help with evacuation, minutes before he is lost in the collapse. 
    A man tells how he saw a video of a woman in flight dropping past the building on the way to her death, he recognized the clothing as that of his wife. 
    If you've been near radio, television, or a screen you too have no doubt heard more, much more, of the same. It is heart breaking. It is unfiltered tragedy. It is also excessive, and exploitive.

    The honest emotion is undeniable. Its expression is painful, horribly painful. But there is a place for it and there are reasons these humans should need dredge up such pain and heartbreak. I don't think that reason is because a network, or media enterprise thinks it should be.
    I'm sorry my father is not here to hear me say that. He was also an absolutist on the first amendment and press freedom but was not without his criticism of media's tendency to hype. As a practitioner of the craft I'd bristle and we'd have a good chat.


        The attack on Pearl Harbor, the JFK assassination,
and before that the end of the Civil War and World War I would draw newspaper attention to those anniversary date,  "look- backs."
      There may be value in those historic reflections, but what makes the date of the 20th Anniversary any more appropriate or relevant to plumb the history than 6 weeks before that, for example. The hook, is anniversary; 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, until there are no survivors and few alive who endured the history.
       There is nothing in the study of history, the psychology of the brain, or compassion for victims that needs to be exercised on an anniversary date. Scholarship is ongoing while media hits get clicks or ratings. 
        I get the history, the importance of remembering and teaching and understanding, and learning. But for heavens sake we need not put these suffering people through the anguish of loss, and broken hearts so we can put together a television program or pod cast to cash in on and exploit the emotion.

        History courses, museums, memorials, family gatherings, tributes, and such is the decent and civilized place for the expressions of those thoughts and feelings. 
        Making people sit for cameras and then range through hurt and loss seems hurtful, wrong and crass.
        This point of view is probably as popular today as it was when I raised in newsrooms and pushed back against such arbitrary enterprises, "back in the day." There was a ghastly triple homicide that local stations and newspapers always trudged out around the anniversary date. Nothing new, no changes, just a replay of gore and sad stories. What's gained?

        There have been a couple of pieces in the blizzard of production that attempted to measure how we have changed, and how we have been affected. They were long on analysis and probing and short on the emotional sound bites and forced memories. 

        On September 10 I was shuttling between Washington and New York. I had meetings near the Towers and at the Pentagon and just across the river. We were working on a nuclear arms project. We were scheduled for a night flight back to Indianapolis, but one of our contacts had been delayed by weather out west. We made plans to fly back to New York, stay in Manhattan and meet him the next day and then shuttle back and take another meeting in Washington. He called to say he was stuck in Chicago and we should reschedule when timing was better. We flew home on the late flight.
        I remember a moment walking in New York, the sky was blue and it was a beautiful day, and I made note of how nice it was and how young those on the streets suddenly seemed. On most previous assignments or trips every thing seemed more of a hassle, gritty and the people were less friendly than they were on September 10, or so I remembered. 
        Several of the tortured souls I saw interviewed in the last week, mentioned what a beautiful fall day September 11 was. Somehow that touched me.

        See you down the trail.

   

 

11 comments:

  1. Tom, I too am pulled between the need to remember for the purpose of moving humanity one step closer to actually learning from our mistakes, and the pain that remembrance brings. I have to err on the side of moving closer to universal peace. I'm still naive enough to think it's possible. Thank you for your memories.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Colleen, I too think it is possible to learn and to understand why universal peace is one of our highest aspirations. Thank you.

      Delete
    2. We were working on a piece on the Cooperative Threat Reduction program, an off shoot of what was first called the Nunn-Lugar act. It was a program the US Senate put in place to control nuclear war heads and weaponry after the fall of the Soviet Union. The Bush administration had spurned the warnings of the former Red Army command about weaponry being up for the highest bid and falling into hands of terrorists. When the Soviet Command was no more, the weapons and their bases fell to the control of local commanders, many of whom had no money or resources to keep troops billeted and essentially on guard. Dick Lugar and Sam Nunn, senior members of the Senate at the time were able to get the authorization and both men got personally involved in getting the weapons under the control of the US. It is one of the greatest American stories that most people don't know.

      Delete
  2. Thank you. We do love to exercise our emotions. There's nothing wrong with that as long as in the end we learn something and change our life as a result of the event and resulting emotion. Our world is filled with joy and tragedy everyday - how we process it learn from it adapt and move forward is how you live a meaningful life. Blessings

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That you for your wisdom. I hope we all can move toward balance and meaning.

      Delete
  3. I felt the same emotions as pretty much everyone did on that day...shock, horror, anger.
    It's now proclaimed to be a time/event that 'brought us all together'. That might be true, unless one was someone of Middle Eastern origins or appearances. Or someone who dressed in any way thought to be 'arabic'. Sikhs, for instance. Many of them were fearful of their safety in the days and weeks following.
    It also brought our a jingoism not seen in many years, and it gave us the TSA, with it's unlimited power over our privacy and doings.
    This is not a popular view, I realize.
    Cheers, Mike.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Spot on! Consider the Patriot Act in its original form.
      Slainte'

      Delete
  4. After that horrible day, we changed and not for the better

    ReplyDelete
  5. On my way to JFK to work a flight that awful day~~~do I need to say more?

    ReplyDelete